25 Replies to “ICC Umpiring Flaws – AL Tony Hill Again 2 ( Bangladesh vs England 2010)”

  1. koop26

    If this was referred to the 3rd umpire it would have been given not out still as not more than half the ball was hitting the stump. The original decision would have stood you half witted wankers.

  2. nickfranklin1993

    He is over 2 meters from the stumps, and it’s hit him above the knee roll, and sliding down leg. Are you a fucking idiot? No way thats out, doesn’t matter what pitch.

  3. vinnifunkie

    clearly bad decision !!! He acknowledges that there is no inside edge, thn it is obviously gona hit the stumps, n that too on a pitch like that one.

  4. ande2375

    lol, just hitting the top of the stumps. hardly a terrible decision. maybe if the bangladeshi board had spent money on the UDRS the decision would have been overturned.

  6. lochlan

    I have no idea what you are moaning about here… much worse decisions are given out/not out regularly outside of the UDRS. If this one went to review it wouldn’t have been give out and given the fact that the benefit of the doubt goes to the batsmen this was the right decision judging by the replays. What it comes down to is this is just you moaning about a decision that didn’t go the way of your country.

  7. chupker

    this is nothing I remember once Afridi appealed thrice when bowling against Yuvi but umpire turn down all three … haweye suggest dismissal possibilities in all cases

  9. RohRohToday

    These videos shd be renamed to Bad umpiring decisions vs Bangladesh. Grow up guys, everyone gets bad decisions. Umpires are not perfect. Other than another Bucknor incident, let’s support UDRS so that a correct and final decision can be reached more frequently.

  10. Samikhan

    Poor umpiring. ICC is blind.They should review the performance of those umpire after every series.I will blame Bangladesh cricket board for not taking any action or make a official complain against those Umpires. Some people are making themselves fool by supporting this decision.Thats why i wont argue with those idiot who can lower me to their level and will beat me by their experience.

  11. camfay77

    Oh fuck off, that was above the roll, he was coming forward and in my opinion, when someone is bowling at 140km/hr, no human being will get that kind of decision correct all the time. Fair decision in the circumstances and you should be ashamed of yourself that you have spent time agonising about this decision.

  12. RohRohToday

    We should be speaking up against all types of bad umpiring. Not just when it happens against our country.

  13. nk7792

    how can you complain about that decision? it was shown to be only just clipping the top of the stumps on hawk-eye, and believe it or not the umpire doesnt have the benefit of looking at a replay, he has to make the call in a second.

  14. chanabnagar

    The benefit of doubt goes to the batsman, so a good decision by the umpire after seeing the review.

  15. 11maverick2k

    This is unfair on the umpire..this is a touch and go and the benefit went to the batsman. Fair enough

  17. realitytalks

    If the UDRS was there its not out, because the ball hitting only just…. If the 21st century technology cant confirm, how can umpires wit real time wit no replays can do!!!

  19. TheFreeForever

    You should have seen this guy during the Pak vs NZ test series.

    He was absolutely horrendous!

    Him and his partner were poor and through the ODI series well.

  23. amfarooqui

    Umpires are only human they will make mistakes its part of the flavour of cricket get on with it

  24. m1kamb

    all those teams must be banned ,which refuses udrs to accept…there is no reason to refuse so y dhoni always refuses.kismat ka muhtaj sala

Comments are closed.